The arm’s-length principle for international transfer pricing continues to have widespread support, a senior OECD official told a London conference amid concerns about the effectiveness of the base erosion and profit-shifting project.
A discussion on the future of the arm’s-length principle on November 29 was hosted by the Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation, whose director Michael Devereux noted that the BEPS project has “triggered a material hike in the complexity of applying” the principle. Richard Collier, an associate fellow at the Centre for Business Taxation, warned that “a continued vulnerability to avoidance will present recurrent and profound difficulties.”
Tomas Balco, the recently appointed head of the transfer pricing unit at the OECD’s Centre for Tax Policy and Administration, offered a personal perspective of “where countries think we are” in relation to the arm’s-length principle … Noting that a previous speaker argued that the principle may not have a long-term future, Balco said feedback from delegates to the OECD’s Working Party 6 on transfer pricing suggests that “nobody thinks the patient is dying.” Read more:
My news story for Tax Analysts, December 2 ($)
My Tax Analysts news story on the debate hosted by the Women in Tax network on November 20 is now free to view.
Governments considering how multinationals should be taxed must address the erosion of public trust in tax administrations, while businesses continue to stress the importance of certainty in tax matters, panellists told a conference hosted by the Women in Tax network at Pinsent Masons’s London office.
A continuing lack of transparency in the UK’s overseas territories and crown dependencies will significantly hinder efforts to curb global corruption, and more must be done to ensure that developing countries’ voices are heard on international tax reform, according to a cross-party committee of members of Parliament.
The International Development Committee welcomed the work done by the OECD through its flagship base erosion and profit-shifting project. “However, international tax discussions must be fully reflective of international concerns, including those of developing countries, and we remain concerned that the OECD – due to its composition – is not adequately reflecting the needs of the poorest countries in its policy outcomes,” the committee said in a report titled “Tackling Corruption Overseas,” published October 19.
Read more: My news story for Tax Analysts October 20 (paywall).
UK government proposals to penalise enablers of tax avoidance schemes could prevent some taxpayers from getting expert advice on complicated issues, according to the Chartered Institute of Taxation. The proposed penalties should be better targeted at those who deliberately seek to profit from avoidance, CIOT said in an October 12 press release.
Separately, Michael Izza, chief executive of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, has warned that politicians have unfairly singled out accountants in their criticism of professional advisers over avoidance.
Read more: My news story for Tax Analysts, October 13 (paywall).
A reorganization of HM Revenue & Customs suggests that the department is thinking “more broadly in taxpayer terms,” a leading tax expert said, as a review commissioned by the Labour Party noted “considerable public dissatisfaction” with the quality of service at HMRC and called for the publication of large companies’ tax returns.
“As HMRC develops its digital services, it is a positive step to see it prioritizing changes to the customer-facing team,” Paul Aplin, vice president of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, said in a statement. “At a time when Brexit has created new challenges for businesses and growth is key to economic recovery, it is vital [that] businesses and their advisers can get simple actions done effectively and efficiently by HMRC.” Continue reading “HMRC announces new structure as critics call for public tax returns”
Tax transparency campaigners have welcomed the UK government’s decision to accept a Finance Bill amendment that will enable HM Treasury to make regulations requiring large multinationals to publish country-by-country reports of their profits and taxes. The government, however, stressed that it intends to seek international agreement on a reporting model before using the new power.
Customers and taxpayers expect big companies to “play fair by them and by the country in which they operate,” Labour member of Parliament Caroline Flint said during a House of Commons debate on September 5. “It sometimes seems as though we are trying to catch jelly.”
Read more: My news story at Tax Notes 7 September (paywall) published by Tax Analysts.
Members of the U.K. Parliament have been urged not to risk “confrontation” with U.S. lawmakers by breaking ranks on public country-by-country (CbC) reporting, as they prepare to debate for a second time a finance bill amendment that would pave the way for mandatory public CbC reporting by large multinationals.
MPs defeated a similar amendment in June by just 22 votes. Labour MP Caroline Flint’s revised amendment, set to be debated on September 5 or 6, has the support of a cross-party group of 60 MPs.
Then-Financial Secretary to the Treasury David Gauke told Flint during the June 28 debate that the government shared her aims of increasing transparency and clamping down on avoidance. The government had “led the way in calling at an international level for public CbC reports,” he said. But Gauke argued that the amendment was technically flawed and that there would be “disadvantages for the U.K.” if Parliament acted unilaterally.
Read more: My news story for Tax Notes, 3 September (paywall) published by Tax Analysts.
The U.K. government’s timetable for implementation of a key base erosion and profit-shifting project reform is too ambitious, tax professionals have warned.
There is “no need to rush” a review of U.K. law on deductibility of interest because existing rules already limit deductibility, the Chartered Institute of Taxation said …
The proposed restrictions are likely to have “significant adverse consequences” for heavily geared infrastructure and energy projects whose viability is often reliant on tax relief for interest, said Eloise Walker, partner at Pinsent Masons LLP, in a client briefing … Continue reading “Tax professionals urge UK government to delay interest expense reform”